Farnk - could be right, but looking at his words??
“When Chris came [in November 2019] it was on my terms,” Holdsworth told the News & Star. “I’d had meetings with various probables and possible, but I presented it to the board, and I got on very well with Chris – I liked his morals and straightforward approach.
“Also, when I asked him to give me a blueprint, it matched what I thought [was right] for League Two, when we considered who’s gone up and been challenging for departure to League One in recent years.
“I love the fact he’s keen on fitness and training ethics, and character references. He has an ability to get as much information as he wants [about targets], then he comes to me and I take over.
“He puts the hard work in alongside me. As a club it’s something we didn’t really have before, in a different management style, but I think this works.
I honestly don’t see where you’re coming from with the above. Beech hadn’t managed before and was untested so it was a punt by the club to appoint him, a gamble. So of course it was on Holdsworth’s terms, it was a buyers market if you like. Now Beech is starting to prove himself he has a bit more leverage when it comes to negotiations.
They each obviously did research into the best way to go about getting out of league two (which may not have matched each person’s initial philosophy). When you look at the likes of Lincoln, not particularly pretty but very effective, it’s hard to disagree. When Beech presented his blueprint it matched what Holdsworth thought. Fair enough I’d say.
Describing exactly what a Director of Football does. Manager identifies the targets, gets as much info on them as he can and then it’s over to the DoF to go and get them. Not many managers these days get involved in signing players.
Like I say, if people don’t like someone they’ll always find an angle to criticise them. Credit where credits due - Holdsworth did well appointing an unknown in Beech and he’s done well with recruitment since.